<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
  <title>Tribunals — LegalRepublic.in</title>
  <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/</link>
  <description>Tribunal and commission updates from India&#39;s specialist legal forums.</description>
  <language>en-IN</language>
  <atom:link href="https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:30:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <item>
    <title>NCLAT Redirects IRP Replacement Plea to NCLT in Bhushan Power CIRP</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/devi-singh-bhushan-power-steel-irp-replacement-nclat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/devi-singh-bhushan-power-steel-irp-replacement-nclat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:30:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The appellate tribunal disposed of applications seeking replacement of IRP Santanu T. Ray, directing the suspended director to first approach NCLT, with a two-week disposal request.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>SREI Equipment Finance Withdraws NCLAT Appeal After SRA Clarifies Mortgaged Mulund Property Not in Resolution Plan</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/srei-equipment-finance-nclat-resolution-plan-property-mortgage-nirmal-lifestyle-mulund/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/srei-equipment-finance-nclat-resolution-plan-property-mortgage-nirmal-lifestyle-mulund/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>SREI Equipment Finance withdrew its challenge to the approved resolution plan of Nirmal Lifestyle (Mulund) after the successful resolution applicant confirmed the disputed mortgaged property was excluded.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order, Allows 87-Day CIRP Exclusion for Senior Builders After RP Change</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/vivek-bansal-vs-sumit-shukla-nclat-cirp-exclusion-87-days-senior-builders/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/vivek-bansal-vs-sumit-shukla-nclat-cirp-exclusion-87-days-senior-builders/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT&#39;s Principal Bench allowed exclusion of 87 days from the CIRP timeline of Senior Builders Ltd., reversing an NCLT order that had rejected the new Resolution Professional&#39;s application.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Upholds Forfeiture of Rs 10 Lakh Security Deposit Against Sunburn Festival Organiser for Noise Violations</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/spacebound-web-labs-sunburn-festival-gspcb-security-deposit-ngt-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/spacebound-web-labs-sunburn-festival-gspcb-security-deposit-ngt-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Western Zone Bench dismissed Spacebound Web Labs&#39; appeal against the Goa Pollution Control Board&#39;s forfeiture of a Rs 10 lakh security deposit over noise limit breaches at the 2022 Sunburn Music Festival.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Farmers&#39; Challenge to Environmental Clearance for Vadodara-Mumbai Expressway Phase I</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/gujarat-khedut-samaj-nhai-vme-ec-appeal-dismissed-ngt-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/gujarat-khedut-samaj-nhai-vme-ec-appeal-dismissed-ngt-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Western Zone Bench, Pune, dismissed a decade-old appeal against the 2016 environmental clearance for the 274-km Vadodara-Mumbai Expressway Phase I, finding no proved infirmity in the public consultation process.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Western Zone Dismisses Appeal Against GCZMA Demolition Order After Panchayat Disowns Key Documents</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/harishchandra-naik-gczma-demolition-appeal-ngt-western-zone-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/harishchandra-naik-gczma-demolition-appeal-ngt-western-zone-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:05:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The National Green Tribunal&#39;s Western Zone Bench upheld a demolition order for illegal coastal structures in Mandrem, Goa, after Gram Panchayat records confirmed the appellant&#39;s documents were never issued.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Hyderabad Quashes Section 148 Reassessments for Four Years, Partly Allows Vamsiram Builders Appeals on Unaccounted Cash Additions</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/vamsiram-builders-itat-hyderabad-section-148-reassessment-quashed-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/vamsiram-builders-itat-hyderabad-section-148-reassessment-quashed-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad quashes Section 148 notices for assessment years 2016-17 to 2019-20 for want of Section 149(1)(b) conditions, while partly sustaining additions on unaccounted cash receipts.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Hyderabad Quashes Reassessment Notices for AY 2017-18 to 2019-20, Partly Allows Appeal on Two-Zero Truncation Issue</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/sohini-developers-llp-itat-hyderabad-section-148-149-reassessment-quashed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/sohini-developers-llp-itat-hyderabad-section-148-149-reassessment-quashed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:55:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad set aside Section 148 notices for three years as barred by limitation, and directed the AO to restrict additions to entries supported by corroborative evidence.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Jodhpur Partly Allows Hindustan Zinc Appeal, Deletes Transfer Pricing Adjustments on Captive Power and ETP Units</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/hindustan-zinc-captive-power-plant-section-80ia-transfer-pricing-itat-jodhpur-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/hindustan-zinc-captive-power-plant-section-80ia-transfer-pricing-itat-jodhpur-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:50:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Jodhpur Bench followed Supreme Court precedent in Jindal Steel to hold that SEB consumer rates, not generation-company tariffs, are the correct benchmark for captive power transfer pricing under section 80-IA.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Order in Shivani Kumari vs Revenue : Source Material Insufficient for Substantive Reporting</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/shivani-kumari-vs-revenue-cat-june-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/shivani-kumari-vs-revenue-cat-june-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:45:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The source digest for this CAT order dated 1 June 2026 contains only a document header and no extractable facts, reasoning, or directions.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Rules on Service Dispute Between Suresh S Biradar and BSNL</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/suresh-s-biradar-v-bsnl-cat-june-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/suresh-s-biradar-v-bsnl-cat-june-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Central Administrative Tribunal decided a service matter between Suresh S Biradar and Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 1 June 2026.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Rules in Mohammed Nasir Pasha vs South Western Railway in June 2026 Order</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/mohammed-nasir-pasha-vs-south-western-railway-cat-june-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/mohammed-nasir-pasha-vs-south-western-railway-cat-june-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:35:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Central Administrative Tribunal decided a service matter between Mohammed Nasir Pasha and South Western Railway in an order dated 1 June 2026.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Upholds DERC Tariff Orders on Plant Availability, Remands Income Tax True-Up for IPGCL and PPCL to State Commission</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/bses-rajdhani-yamuna-derc-ipgcl-ppcl-plant-availability-income-tax-aptel-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/bses-rajdhani-yamuna-derc-ipgcl-ppcl-plant-availability-income-tax-aptel-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL dismissed BSES distribution companies&#39; challenge to gas plant availability figures but remanded income tax recovery disputes to DERC for recomputation on a Return on Equity basis.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Replaces 6% Interest on DPS Refund with SBI Prime Lending Rate in Tata Steel vs DVC Dispute</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/tata-steel-dvc-dps-amg-interest-rate-aptel-appeal-179-2021/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/tata-steel-dvc-dps-amg-interest-rate-aptel-appeal-179-2021/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:25:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL set aside JSERC&#39;s 6% interest award on delayed payment surcharge refund, directing DVC to pay interest at SBI Prime Lending Rate on AMG bill surcharges recovered from Tata Steel.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Punjab&#39;s Housefed Cannot Shield 62% Price Hike Behind &amp;ldquo;Tentative Cost&amp;rdquo; Clause, Rules Chandigarh State Commission</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/housefed-punjab-banur-flat-price-escalation-refund-appeals-dismissed-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/housefed-punjab-banur-flat-price-escalation-refund-appeals-dismissed-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The State Consumer Commission dismissed five appeals by Housefed Punjab, upholding refund orders for allottees who refused to pay a 62% price escalation on Banur flats with no possession timeline.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Rajasthan State Commission Sets Aside Railway Theft Award, Holds Unbooked Luggage Snatching Not Deficiency in Service</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/station-superintendent-nwr-v-abha-sharma-fa-133-2022-rajasthan-scdrc-bikaner/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/station-superintendent-nwr-v-abha-sharma-fa-133-2022-rajasthan-scdrc-bikaner/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Rajasthan SCDRC Circuit Bench at Bikaner set aside a district forum award of over Rs. 1.12 lakh against North Western Railway, finding no proved negligence and no valid evidence affidavit from the complainant.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>Chandigarh State Commission Dismisses Builder&#39;s Appeal, Upholds Refund of ₹23.60 Lakh With 9% Interest in Crescent Parc Plot Dispute</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/impact-sare-magnum-townships-shiv-rattan-kapahi-appeal-131-2025-scdrc-chandigarh/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/impact-sare-magnum-townships-shiv-rattan-kapahi-appeal-131-2025-scdrc-chandigarh/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The State Consumer Commission at Chandigarh dismissed M/s Impact Sare Magnum Townships&#39; appeal, holding that no valid possession was ever offered and the complaint was not time-barred.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>TDSAT Allows MIAL Appeal, Sets Aside Key Parts of AERA&#39;s Fourth Control Period Tariff Order for Mumbai Airport</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/tdsat/mial-vs-aera-fourth-control-period-tariff-csmia-tdsat-2025/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/tdsat/mial-vs-aera-fourth-control-period-tariff-csmia-tdsat-2025/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:05:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>TDSAT has allowed Mumbai International Airport&#39;s appeal against AERA&#39;s aeronautical tariff order for Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, directing AERA to revise its determinations across nineteen regulatory issues within three months.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>TDSAT Sets Aside Rs 1.51 Crore IT Act Order Against YES Bank, Finds Adjudicating Officer Denied Fair Hearing</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/tdsat/yes-bank-wardha-nagari-cyber-appeal-03-2025-tdsat-natural-justice/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/tdsat/yes-bank-wardha-nagari-cyber-appeal-03-2025-tdsat-natural-justice/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 12:00:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>TDSAT quashes a Mumbai Adjudicating Officer&#39;s order directing YES Bank to refund Rs 1.21 crore and pay Rs 29.83 lakh compensation, holding the final hearing was conducted without valid notice.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>TDSAT Sets Aside 2011 Order That Barred Corporate Complainant Under IT Act Section 43, Remands to Karnataka Adjudicator</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/tdsat/gujarat-petrosynthese-axis-bank-it-act-section-43-body-corporate-tdsat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/tdsat/gujarat-petrosynthese-axis-bank-it-act-section-43-body-corporate-tdsat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>TDSAT allows Gujarat Petrosynthese&#39;s cyber appeal, holding that a body corporate can invoke Section 43 of the IT Act and directing fresh adjudication within six months.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Forms Prima Facie View of Competition Act Violation, Orders DG Investigation in Case No. 41 of 2025</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-case-no-41-of-2025-dg-investigation-directed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-case-no-41-of-2025-dg-investigation-directed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:50:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission of India has formed a prima facie opinion of contravention of the Competition Act, 2002 and directed the Director General to investigate Case No. 41 of 2025.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Closes Complaint Against InVideo AI, Finds Subscription Cancellation Dispute Lacks Competition Concern</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/dinesh-kumar-dadsena-vs-whitesheep-technology-invideo-ai-cci-case-01-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/dinesh-kumar-dadsena-vs-whitesheep-technology-invideo-ai-cci-case-01-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:45:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission of India closed a Section 4 complaint against AI video platform InVideo AI, holding that a subscriber&#39;s grievance over cancelled paid minutes is a private dispute, not a competition matter.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses Industrial Consumers&#39; Appeal Against DVC Tariff Order, Refuses to Condone 1,125-Day Delay</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/brahm-alloys-wberc-dvc-delay-condonation-dismissed-aptel-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/brahm-alloys-wberc-dvc-delay-condonation-dismissed-aptel-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Three Kolkata-based industrial consumers failed to explain a delay of over 1,125 days in challenging a 2022 DVC tariff order; APTEL dismissed the appeal as time-barred.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Jammu Dismisses Age Relaxation Pleas for J&amp;K Police Sub-Inspector Recruitment, Vacates Interim Orders</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/cat-jammu-dismisses-age-relaxation-plea-sub-inspector-jk-police-2024/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/cat-jammu-dismisses-age-relaxation-plea-sub-inspector-jk-police-2024/</guid>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 10:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Hundreds of overage candidates sought relaxation in the 28-year upper age limit for J&amp;K Police Sub-Inspector posts; CAT Jammu found no arbitrariness and dismissed all seven connected applications.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order on JSK Marketing Lease Dispute, Remands for Fresh Adjudication on Fraudulent Trading Claim</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/orix-leasing-finvin-jsk-marketing-master-lease-agreement-fraudulent-trading-remand-nclat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/orix-leasing-finvin-jsk-marketing-master-lease-agreement-fraudulent-trading-remand-nclat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 12:05:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT remands to NCLT Mumbai a disputed Master Lease Agreement between Orix Leasing and JSK Marketing, directing fresh consideration of fraud and moratorium violation claims.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Remands Section 7 IBC Petition After Finding NCLT Did Not Issue Notice to Corporate Debtor Before Rejecting It</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/rajender-prasad-mittal-vs-jaikrishan-estates-nclat-section-7-ibc-remand-financial-debt/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/rajender-prasad-mittal-vs-jaikrishan-estates-nclat-section-7-ibc-remand-financial-debt/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 12:00:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT sets aside NCLT&#39;s rejection of a director&#39;s Section 7 petition over Rs. 6.86 crore interest-free loan, citing procedural failure and unexamined factual questions about the debt&#39;s true character.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Dismisses Oppression Petition by Minority Shareholder-Wife, Upholds Limitation Bar on 2012&amp;ndash;2013 Directorship and Share Dilution Claims</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/shefali-agrawal-vs-stone-age-pvt-ltd-nclat-oppression-mismanagement-dismissed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/shefali-agrawal-vs-stone-age-pvt-ltd-nclat-oppression-mismanagement-dismissed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 11:55:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT&#39;s Principal Bench dismisses Shefali Agrawal&#39;s appeal, holding her claims of illegal removal as director and share dilution were time-barred, with knowledge established from 2013.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Dismisses Suspended Director&#39;s Challenge to CIRP Admission of Bliss Abode and Bliss House</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/bindu-kapoor-bliss-abode-bliss-house-cirp-nclat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/bindu-kapoor-bliss-abode-bliss-house-cirp-nclat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 11:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT upholds CIRP admission against two Rana Kapoor-linked real estate companies, ruling the loan recall notice of 9 March 2020 validly triggered default under the IBC.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Closes Abuse of Dominance Case Against Batra Hospital, Rejects DG&#39;s Pricing Methodology</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-batra-hospital-section-4-abuse-dominant-position-closed-case-77-11-2015/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-batra-hospital-section-4-abuse-dominant-position-closed-case-77-11-2015/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 11:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission found the Director General&#39;s comparisons of hospital prices with standalone diagnostic labs and procurement costs inadequate to establish unfair pricing under Section 4.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Closes Case Against Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rejects DG&#39;s Aftermarket Abuse Findings</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-sir-ganga-ram-hospital-section-4-abuse-dominant-position-closed-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-sir-ganga-ram-hospital-section-4-abuse-dominant-position-closed-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 11:40:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission found the Director General&#39;s methodology flawed on relevant market, pricing comparisons, and dominant position, closing the decade-long Section 4 inquiry.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Orders DG Investigation into Pernod Ricard&#39;s Alleged Exclusive Dealing in Delhi IMFL Market</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-pernod-ricard-delhi-imfl-exclusive-dealing-investigation-case-09-2024/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-pernod-ricard-delhi-imfl-exclusive-dealing-investigation-case-09-2024/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 11:35:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission finds a prima facie case of exclusive dealing under Section 3(4)(b) against Pernod Ricard and linked wholesalers and retailers in Delhi&#39;s IMFL market.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Closes Anti-Competitive Case Against Rapido, Finds No Prima Facie Violation of Section 4</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-closes-rapido-anti-competitive-case-deep-chandra-pande-case-47-2025/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-closes-rapido-anti-competitive-case-deep-chandra-pande-case-47-2025/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 11:30:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission of India dismissed a complaint alleging predatory pricing and market abuse by ride-hailing platform Rapido, finding the charges unsubstantiated under competition law.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Rejects Interim Relief Plea by People for Animals Against Poultry Giants, Cites SAIL Judgment Standard</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/people-for-animals-v-venkateshwara-hatcheries-cci-interim-relief-rejected-case-15-2025/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/people-for-animals-v-venkateshwara-hatcheries-cci-interim-relief-rejected-case-15-2025/</guid>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 11:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission of India declined interim directions against Venkateshwara Hatcheries and related entities, holding the informant failed to meet the high threshold set by the Supreme Court in the SAIL judgment.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Sets Aside Ligare Aviation Insolvency Admission, Holds Round-Tripped Funds Cannot Constitute Financial Debt</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/ligare-aviation-section-7-set-aside-round-tripping-no-financial-debt-nclat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/ligare-aviation-section-7-set-aside-round-tripping-no-financial-debt-nclat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:05:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT finds Rs 3.6 crore transferred to Ligare Aviation and immediately routed back to a Religare subsidiary the same day was not a genuine financial debt under IBC.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Sets Aside NCLT Order Dismissing Nine Section 7 Applications, Quashes Rs 25 Lakh Penalty on Financial Creditor and Corporate Debtors</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/jk-integrated-textiles-park-silklon-processors-section-7-nclat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/jk-integrated-textiles-park-silklon-processors-section-7-nclat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT&#39;s Principal Bench reverses NCLT Chandigarh&#39;s dismissal of nine IBC Section 7 applications filed by J&amp;K Integrated Textiles Park, finding financial debt proved and Section 65 penalty unsustainable.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses UPCL Appeal, Holds Long-Term and Mid-Term Open Access Consumers Exempt from Cross Subsidy Surcharge</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/upcl-v-india-glycols-cross-subsidy-surcharge-open-access-aptel-appeal-190-2018/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/upcl-v-india-glycols-cross-subsidy-surcharge-open-access-aptel-appeal-190-2018/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Uttarakhand Power Corporation&#39;s attempt to levy cross subsidy surcharge on mid-term open access consumers fails as APTEL upholds the UERC&#39;s interpretation of Regulation 22.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses GRIDCO&#39;s Review Petition as Appeal in Disguise in Power Purchase Dispute with Vedanta</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/gridco-vedanta-review-petition-aptel-rp-28-2025/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/gridco-vedanta-review-petition-aptel-rp-28-2025/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:50:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL dismissed GRIDCO Limited&#39;s review petition challenging its September 2025 judgment on a revised PPA dispute with Vedanta, finding no error apparent on the face of record.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses BSES Discoms&#39; Bid to Reword CAG Audit Order, Directs Regulatory Asset Liquidation by 16 June 2026</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/aptel-bses-discoms-cag-audit-modification-dismissed-regulatory-assets-liquidation-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/aptel-bses-discoms-cag-audit-modification-dismissed-regulatory-assets-liquidation-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL rejected BSES Rajdhani and BSES Yamuna&#39;s attempt to substitute its reasoned CAG audit ruling and separately pressed DERC to begin regulatory asset liquidation by 16 June 2026.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses BESCOM&#39;s Stay Plea Over Delayed Challenge to KERC Tariff Order, Cites Acquiescence and Lack of Urgency</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/bescom-brics-renewable-stay-dismissed-aptel-appeal-482-2024/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/bescom-brics-renewable-stay-dismissed-aptel-appeal-482-2024/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:40:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL refused to stay a 2021 KERC order restoring PPA tariff of Rs.5.07/kWh to a solar developer, finding BESCOM had slept on its rights for over four years.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses DERC&#39;s Bid to Review CAG Audit Quashing, Directs Regulatory Asset Liquidation from 16 June 2026</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/derc-review-petition-cag-audit-regulatory-assets-aptel-may-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/derc-review-petition-cag-audit-regulatory-assets-aptel-may-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:35:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL rejected Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission&#39;s review petitions challenging its 20 April 2026 order on CAG audit and regulatory asset liquidation, granting only a 45-day window for chartered accountant appointment.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Sets Aside DERC Order, Holds BSES Discoms Not Liable for Post-PPA Expiry Energy Bills from Rajghat Power House</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/bses-yamuna-rajdhani-ipgcl-rajghat-ppa-expiry-energy-bills-aptel-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/bses-yamuna-rajdhani-ipgcl-rajghat-ppa-expiry-energy-bills-aptel-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:30:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL quashes DERC&#39;s direction to BSES Yamuna and BSES Rajdhani to pay Rajghat Power House energy bills after their PPAs expired in mid-2015, ruling obligations ceased on expiry.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses Chemplast Sanmar and Allied Appellants&#39; Bids to Condone Decade-Long Delay in Challenging Tamil Nadu Tariff Orders on Deemed Demand Charges</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/chemplast-sanmar-tnerc-deemed-demand-charges-delay-condonation-dismissed-aptel-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/chemplast-sanmar-tnerc-deemed-demand-charges-delay-condonation-dismissed-aptel-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL refuses to condone delays of up to 5,100 days in appeals against Tamil Nadu tariff orders, finding appellants lacked good faith and diligence under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Upholds TNERC Order on Rs 2,500 Crore Subsidy Surrender, T&amp;D Losses, and Cross Subsidy Surcharge in TANGEDCO Tariff Dispute</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/tamil-nadu-spinning-mills-association-v-tnerc-aptel-appeal-356-2017/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/tamil-nadu-spinning-mills-association-v-tnerc-aptel-appeal-356-2017/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity dismissed a spinning mills association&#39;s challenge to TNERC&#39;s 2017 tariff order, upholding TANGEDCO&#39;s subsidy relinquishment under the UDAY scheme and approving the cross subsidy surcharge methodology.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Restores Rs. 210 Crore Pay Revision Cost for DVC, Remands T&amp;D Loss True-Up to JSERC</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/dvc-v-jserc-pay-revision-td-losses-true-up-aptel-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/dvc-v-jserc-pay-revision-td-losses-true-up-aptel-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:15:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity partly allowed DVC&#39;s appeal against JSERC&#39;s true-up order, ruling that a CERC-approved pay revision amount cannot be excluded by a State Commission.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Dismisses NTPC&#39;s Force Majeure Claim Over Farakka Water Shortage, Cites Decade-Long Inaction on Lift Pumps</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/ntpc-farakka-force-majeure-water-shortage-aptel-appeal-23-2018/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/ntpc-farakka-force-majeure-water-shortage-aptel-appeal-23-2018/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NTPC sought relief for plant shutdowns at Farakka caused by low Ganga Feeder Canal water levels, but APTEL held the situation was foreseeable and self-attributable.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>APTEL Upholds Forest Tax as Change in Law for Maruti Clean Coal, Rejects Rajasthan Discoms&#39; Plea on Pre-Existing 2002 Notification</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/rajasthan-urja-vikas-nigam-maruti-clean-coal-forest-tax-change-in-law-aptel-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/aptel/rajasthan-urja-vikas-nigam-maruti-clean-coal-forest-tax-change-in-law-aptel-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:05:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>APTEL dismisses Rajasthan distribution companies&#39; appeal, holding that Chhattisgarh forest transit levy became a compensable change-in-law event only from 1 November 2012, after the bid cut-off date.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Sandstone Miners&#39; Appeals Against Rajasthan PCB Environmental Compensation Orders</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-dismisses-sandstone-miners-appeals-environmental-compensation-rajasthan-pcb/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-dismisses-sandstone-miners-appeals-environmental-compensation-rajasthan-pcb/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed 23 appeals by Bharatpur sandstone miners challenging environmental compensation imposed by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board for air quality and plantation violations.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Ahmedabad Dismisses Revenue&#39;s Appeal in Cadila Pharmaceuticals Case, Partly Allows Assessee&#39;s Cross-Appeal for AY 2013-14</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/cadila-pharmaceuticals-dcit-ahmedabad-itat-ay-2013-14-transfer-pricing-forex-rd-deduction/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/cadila-pharmaceuticals-dcit-ahmedabad-itat-ay-2013-14-transfer-pricing-forex-rd-deduction/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 06:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Ahmedabad Tribunal dismissed all twelve Revenue grounds covering transfer pricing, forex hedging losses and R&amp;D deductions, while partly allowing Cadila Pharmaceuticals&#39; cross-appeal.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Ahmedabad Allows Reckitt Benckiser&#39;s Appeals on Section 80-IC, Goodwill Depreciation and Transfer Pricing for AY 2014-15 to 2017-18</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/reckitt-benckiser-healthcare-india-itat-ahmedabad-section-80ic-transfer-pricing-goodwill-depreciation/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/reckitt-benckiser-healthcare-india-itat-ahmedabad-section-80ic-transfer-pricing-goodwill-depreciation/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 06:54:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allows assessee&#39;s cross-appeals across four assessment years, dismisses Revenue&#39;s challenge to 100% section 80-IC deduction for Baddi Unit after substantial expansion.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Clears Bhopal Bypass Project, Orders 80,000-Tree Compensatory Plantation and 15-Year Monitoring</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/nitin-saxena-nhai-bhopal-ayodhya-bypass-tree-felling-ngt-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/nitin-saxena-nhai-bhopal-ayodhya-bypass-tree-felling-ngt-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 06:54:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Principal Bench disposed of a challenge to NHAI&#39;s Ayodhya Bypass six-laning project in Bhopal, accepting a High Level Committee report permitting felling of 7,871 trees subject to strict compensatory and monitoring conditions.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses 23 Sandstone Miners&#39; Appeals, Upholds Environmental Compensation Imposed by Rajasthan PCB for Violations in Bharatpur Cluster</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-dismisses-sandstone-miners-appeals-environmental-compensation-bharatpur-rajasthan/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-dismisses-sandstone-miners-appeals-environmental-compensation-bharatpur-rajasthan/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 06:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed appeals by 23 sandstone mining leaseholders in Bharatpur, Rajasthan, upholding environmental compensation totalling approximately Rs 4.6 crores imposed by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Mumbai Deletes Rs 49 Lakh Capital Gains Addition, Holds Actual Agricultural Operations Not a Statutory Condition Under Section 2(14)(iii)</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/sohanlal-sewaram-jaggi-huf-vs-ito-agricultural-land-capital-asset-section-2-14-iii/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/sohanlal-sewaram-jaggi-huf-vs-ito-agricultural-land-capital-asset-section-2-14-iii/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Mumbai ITAT allowed a HUF&#39;s appeal for AY 2012-13, holding that land 17-18 km from Pune&#39;s municipal limits retained agricultural character and fell outside the capital asset definition.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Mumbai Dismisses Revenue&#39;s Bogus LTCG Addition on GIFL Shares, Upholds CIT(A) Deletion of Rs 16.95 Crore Section 68 Addition</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/dcit-mumbai-vs-kishor-premchand-lahrani-huf-gifl-ltcg-bogus-penny-stock-itat-mumbai-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/dcit-mumbai-vs-kishor-premchand-lahrani-huf-gifl-ltcg-bogus-penny-stock-itat-mumbai-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Mumbai ITAT dismisses Revenue appeals challenging deletion of Rs 16.95 crore Section 68 addition on alleged bogus LTCG from Global Infratech and Finance Limited shares across multiple assessees and assessment years.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Sandstone Miners&#39; Appeals Against Environmental Compensation Imposed by Rajasthan PCB for TTZ-Area Violations</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/deepraj-singh-union-of-india-ngt-sandstone-mining-environmental-compensation-bharatpur/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/deepraj-singh-union-of-india-ngt-sandstone-mining-environmental-compensation-bharatpur/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:57:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed 23 appeals by Bharatpur sandstone miners challenging environmental compensation orders issued by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board for breaches of EC conditions near the Taj Trapezium Zone.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Ahmedabad: USD 1.09 Million US SEC Whistleblower Reward Is Taxable Income, Not a Windfall or Capital Receipt</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/itat-ahmedabad-sec-whistleblower-reward-taxable-income-premal-pandya/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/itat-ahmedabad-sec-whistleblower-reward-taxable-income-premal-pandya/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Ahmedabad ITAT held that a reward of Rs 8.16 crore received from the US Securities and Exchange Commission for whistleblowing was taxable income, rejecting windfall and capital receipt arguments.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Ahmedabad Restores Godhavi Land On-Money Additions to CIT(A) After Finding Seized Loose Sheet Insufficient to Sustain Section 69A Additions</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/popular-group-ahmedabad-godhavi-land-on-money-itat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/popular-group-ahmedabad-godhavi-land-on-money-itat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:56:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Ahmedabad ITAT remanded on-money additions totalling crores against multiple members of the Popular Group, holding a single handwritten loose sheet could not sustain Section 69A additions without corroborative evidence.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Dismisses Suraksha Realty Appeal, Holds 2021 Mortgage on Radius Estate Project a Preferential Transaction Under IBC</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/suraksha-realty-vithal-dahake-mortgage-preferential-transaction-nclat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/suraksha-realty-vithal-dahake-mortgage-preferential-transaction-nclat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:56:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT upholds NCLT Mumbai&#39;s finding that a mortgage executed two months before CIRP commencement, securing a 2014 debenture debt, was preferential under Section 43 of the IBC.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Hyderabad: Section 13(1)(b) Cannot Be Invoked Against Society Whose Charitable Activities Revenue Itself Accepted</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/jamia-osman-bin-affan-education-society-section-13-1-b-registration-cancellation-itat-hyderabad-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/jamia-osman-bin-affan-education-society-section-13-1-b-registration-cancellation-itat-hyderabad-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:56:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad deletes Rs 4.10 crore in additions and sets aside retrospective cancellation of registration for Jamia Osman Bin Affan Education Society.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Bangalore Allows Goodwill Depreciation on Amalgamation, Remands Connectivity Charges and Network Acquisition for Fresh Computation</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/itat-bangalore-atria-convergence-technologies-connectivity-charges-goodwill-depreciation-ay-2016-17/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/itat-bangalore-atria-convergence-technologies-connectivity-charges-goodwill-depreciation-ay-2016-17/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Bangalore Bench resolves five substantive disputes for Atria Convergence Technologies for AY 2016-17, covering optical fibre charges, section 14A, network acquisition, goodwill, and debenture redemption premium.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Pune Scraps Separate On-Money and Section 69A Additions Against Viraj Estates, Orders Unified Peak Credit Across All Seized Cash Books</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/viraj-estates-nashik-unified-peak-credit-search-on-money-itat-pune-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/viraj-estates-nashik-unified-peak-credit-search-on-money-itat-pune-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:56:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Pune Bench directed the Assessing Officer to recompute income using a single chronological peak credit ledger drawn from all seized handwritten and digital cash books, deleting gross on-money and Section 69A additions.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Restores RP&#39;s Authority Over Ananta Residency, Holds Halwasiya Cannot Claim Ownership Through Unregistered Development Agreement</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/phoenix-arc-halwasiya-developments-ananta-residency-cirp-nclat-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/phoenix-arc-halwasiya-developments-ananta-residency-cirp-nclat-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:55:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT partly allows four IBC appeals, sets aside NCLT&#39;s finding that project Ananta Residency became Halwasiya&#39;s asset, and directs full document access to the Resolution Professional.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Sandstone Miners&#39; Appeals Against Environmental Compensation Imposed by Rajasthan PCB for Violations in Taj Trapezium Zone</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/kapil-agarwal-union-of-india-ngt-sandstone-mining-environmental-compensation-bharatpur/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/kapil-agarwal-union-of-india-ngt-sandstone-mining-environmental-compensation-bharatpur/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:55:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed 23 appeals by Bharatpur sandstone miners, upholding environmental compensation of approximately Rs 4.6 crore imposed by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Sandstone Miners&#39; Appeals Against Environmental Compensation Imposed by Rajasthan PCB for Taj Trapezium Zone Violations</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/shiv-shankar-stones-suppliers-ngt-sandstone-mining-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-dismissed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/shiv-shankar-stones-suppliers-ngt-sandstone-mining-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-dismissed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:55:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed 23 appeals by Bharatpur sandstone miners challenging environmental compensation of approximately Rs 4.6 crore imposed by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Sandstone Miners&#39; Appeals Against Environmental Compensation Imposed by Rajasthan PCB for Violations in Taj Trapezium Zone</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-sandstone-miners-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-dismissed-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-sandstone-miners-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-dismissed-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:55:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed 23 appeals by Bharatpur sandstone miners challenging environmental compensation of approximately Rs 4.6 crore imposed by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses 23 Sandstone Mining Appeals, Upholds Rajasthan PCB&#39;s Environmental Compensation Orders</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-sandstone-mining-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-rspcb-appeals-dismissed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-sandstone-mining-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-rspcb-appeals-dismissed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:54:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed appeals by 23 Bharatpur sandstone miners challenging RSPCB show-cause notices and environmental compensation totalling approximately ₹4.6 crores for EC condition violations.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against CIRP Admission, Holds Consequence Sheet Signed by Corporate Debtor Crystallises Undisputed Debt of Rs 3.84 Crore</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/rakesh-dalpatram-panchal-vs-kisaan-steels-nclat-section-9-ibc-appeal-dismissed/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/nclat/rakesh-dalpatram-panchal-vs-kisaan-steels-nclat-section-9-ibc-appeal-dismissed/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench finds no pre-existing dispute where the corporate debtor itself prepared and signed a consequence sheet quantifying the undisputed amount owed to the operational creditor.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Bangalore Allows Goodwill Depreciation on Amalgamation, Restores Connectivity Charges and Network Acquisition to Assessing Officer</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/atria-convergence-technologies-itat-bangalore-connectivity-charges-goodwill-depreciation-ay-2016-17/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/atria-convergence-technologies-itat-bangalore-connectivity-charges-goodwill-depreciation-ay-2016-17/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:53:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Bangalore Bench resolves five substantive disputes for Atria Convergence Technologies for AY 2016-17, allowing goodwill depreciation and non-compete depreciation while remanding connectivity charges and network acquisition.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Pune Directs Unified Peak Credit Method for Viraj Group&#39;s Unaccounted Cash Book Entries, Deletes Gross On-Money Additions</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/viraj-estates-nashik-unified-peak-credit-on-money-itat-pune-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/viraj-estates-nashik-unified-peak-credit-on-money-itat-pune-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 05:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Pune Bench set aside separate additions on gross on-money receipts and Section 69A peaks, directing the Assessing Officer to recompute income using a single chronological peak credit ledger.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Quashes Post-Retirement Leave Recovery Against Retired MES Chief Engineer, Orders Reconsideration of LTC Cash Package Claim</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/naresh-kumar-goel-v-defence-cat-leave-encashment-ltc-cash-package-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/naresh-kumar-goel-v-defence-cat-leave-encashment-ltc-cash-package-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 05:45:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Principal Bench held that reconstructing a leave account post-retirement without a show-cause notice and denying LTC benefit on a pre-scheme advance payment were both legally unsustainable.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NCDRC Sets Aside Turbine Insurance Repudiation, Awards Rs 3.05 Crore to Power Company</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/satyamaharishi-power-iffco-tokio-turbine-insurance-repudiation-ncdrc-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ncdrc/satyamaharishi-power-iffco-tokio-turbine-insurance-repudiation-ncdrc-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 05:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>NCDRC holds IFFCO-Tokio&#39;s 2012 repudiation of a machinery breakdown claim invalid, finding the insurer had knowledge of the rotor swap through broker communications and pre-inspection.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Closes Abuse of Dominance Case Against Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Finds DG&#39;s Pricing Analysis Unsustainable</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-indraprastha-apollo-hospital-section-4-abuse-dominant-position-closed-case-77-10-2015/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-indraprastha-apollo-hospital-section-4-abuse-dominant-position-closed-case-77-10-2015/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 05:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission found the Director General&#39;s comparisons of hospital prices with hotel tariffs and standalone diagnostic labs methodologically flawed, closing the Section 4 case against Apollo Hospital.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Closes Case Against Fortis Vasant Kunj Hospital, Finds No Abuse of Dominant Position in In-Patient Aftermarket</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-fortis-vasant-kunj-hospital-aftermarket-abuse-section-4-closed-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-fortis-vasant-kunj-hospital-aftermarket-abuse-section-4-closed-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 05:20:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission of India closed Case No. 77(7) of 2015 against Fortis Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital, finding the DG&#39;s aftermarket abuse findings unsustainable on evidence.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>ITAT Ahmedabad Restores Godhavi Land On-Money Additions to CIT(A): Loose Sheet Alone Cannot Sustain Section 69A Additions</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/itat-ahmedabad-popular-group-godhavi-land-on-money-section-69a-restored-cita/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/itat/itat-ahmedabad-popular-group-godhavi-land-on-money-section-69a-restored-cita/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 05:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Ahmedabad ITAT remands on-money additions against Popular Group sellers, holding a handwritten loose sheet without cash trail or corroboration cannot sustain section 69A additions.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Allahabad Dismisses Group D Railway Candidates&#39; Appointment Claim Arising from 2007 Advertisement</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/sunil-kumar-v-chairman-railway-recruitment-cell-ner-oa-208-2020-cat-allahabad-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/sunil-kumar-v-chairman-railway-recruitment-cell-ner-oa-208-2020-cat-allahabad-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:48:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Four candidates who cleared all stages of North Eastern Railway&#39;s 2007 Group D selection but were placed only in the 20% replacement panel have had their appointment claim dismissed by CAT Allahabad.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CCI Closes Case Against Max Patparganj Hospital, Finds DG&#39;s Excessive Pricing Analysis Unsustainable</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-max-patparganj-hospital-dominant-position-aftermarket-abuse-closed-case-77-2015/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cci/cci-max-patparganj-hospital-dominant-position-aftermarket-abuse-closed-case-77-2015/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:35:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The Competition Commission of India closed a decade-long inquiry against Max Super Specialty Hospital, Patparganj, finding the Director General&#39;s methodology for establishing unfair pricing under Section 4 legally insufficient.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Allahabad Dismisses Group D Replacement Panel Claims From 2007 North Eastern Railway Recruitment</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/rajesh-yadav-ne-railway-group-d-replacement-panel-2007-dismissed-cat-allahabad/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/rajesh-yadav-ne-railway-group-d-replacement-panel-2007-dismissed-cat-allahabad/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:35:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Thirteen candidates on the 20% extra replacement panel of a 2007 North Eastern Railway Group D recruitment sought appointment; CAT Allahabad dismissed the original application after the select list&#39;s life had ended.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Nagaur Sand Mining Challenge, Finds DSR Approved by Competent Authority and Application Time-Barred</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-dismisses-nagaur-dsr-sand-mining-challenge-harsukhram-rajasthan-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/ngt-dismisses-nagaur-dsr-sand-mining-challenge-harsukhram-rajasthan-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:33:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed a challenge to Rajasthan&#39;s Nagaur District Survey Report and related mining lease, holding the application was time-barred, non-maintainable, and an efficacious alternate remedy existed.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>NGT Dismisses Bharatpur Sandstone Miners&#39; Appeals Against Environmental Compensation Totalling ₹4.6 Crore</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/sandstone-miners-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-ngt-central-zone-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/ngt/sandstone-miners-bharatpur-environmental-compensation-ngt-central-zone-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:32:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>The NGT Central Zone Bench dismissed 23 appeals by sandstone mining leaseholders in Bharatpur, upholding environmental compensation imposed by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board under the Air Act.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Allahabad Dismisses Group D Candidates&#39; Appointment Claim After NER Surrendered 500 Trackman Vacancies</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/pappu-kumar-v-union-of-india-ner-group-d-replacement-panel-cat-allahabad-2026/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/pappu-kumar-v-union-of-india-ner-group-d-replacement-panel-cat-allahabad-2026/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Fourteen candidates who cleared all stages of North Eastern Railway&#39;s 2007 Group D recruitment failed to secure appointment; CAT Allahabad finds no illegality in vacancy surrender and holds Dinesh Kumar Kashyap inapplicable.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
<item>
    <title>CAT Allahabad Dismisses Group D Railway Candidates&#39; Appointment Claim From 2007 Recruitment Panel</title>
    <link>https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/sk-yadav-union-of-india-cat-allahabad-group-d-railway-recruitment-2007/</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.legalrepublic.in/tribunals/cat/sk-yadav-union-of-india-cat-allahabad-group-d-railway-recruitment-2007/</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 04:19:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manaswi Singh</dc:creator>
    <description>Twelve candidates on the 20% extra replacement panel of a 2007 North Eastern Railway recruitment sought Group D appointments; CAT Allahabad dismissed the application finding the select list had expired and key precedents inapplicable.</description>
    <category>Tribunals</category>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>