Latest Allahabad Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
The Allahabad High Court found that 63 of 92 sanctioned posts in U.P.'s GST Appellate Tribunal remain vacant, and dismissed repeated circulars as insufficient compliance.
A Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court set aside a life sentence under Section 304 IPC, finding the dying declaration unreliable because it was recorded in the presence of the deceased's relatives.
A Division Bench upheld the 1988 Sessions Court conviction of Jabir for murder and attempt to murder, finding injured witnesses credible and common intention under Section 34 IPC established.
Allahabad High Court holds that after 2014 Rules, minimum typing speed is an eligibility condition for Junior Assistant promotion, not merely a later-stage test.
Allahabad High Court dismisses second appeal, ruling that an auction purchaser who bought property during a pending specific performance suit takes it subject to that suit's outcome.
The Allahabad High Court found that the UP government executed a registered sale deed for temple land adjacent to Ram Janma Bhoomi, took immediate possession, then refused to pay the agreed Rs 1.38 crore consideration.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a second appeal, holding that without consecration of any idol of Lord Rama, no juristic person ever came into existence to sustain the suit.
Allahabad High Court dismisses a Class IV employee's challenge to compulsory retirement, holding that promotion in 2000 did not erase adverse ACR entries relevant to his forced exit in 2005.
The Allahabad High Court held that Special Teachers appointed under the IEDC Scheme cannot be denied pay parity with regular teachers, rejecting the State's contractual-appointment defence.
A Division Bench found the Governor's order under Article 161 recorded the petitioner's imprisonment as two years when the jail report showed four years and six months.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a PIL alleging non-vegetarian shop-keepers were being coerced to shut during Kanwar Yatra, finding the petition mala fide and designed for publicity.
The Lucknow Bench held that the 18-month period for settlement orders starts from first allotment to an Interim Board, not from a subsequent administrative transfer between boards.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed a writ petition by an existing petrol pump owner who sought to block a new outlet nearby, holding that competing business interest confers no locus standi under Article 226.
Quashing orders from 1972 and 1978, the Allahabad High Court held that continuous Khatauni records spanning multiple Faslis could not be displaced by a single Khasra entry or a Section 145 CrPC order.
The Allahabad High Court held that Sunworld City Pvt. Ltd. is entitled to zero period benefit under the Government Order of 27 October 2023, while finding both YEIDA and the developer in default over a decade-long residential township dispute.
A Dainik Jagaran report of children agitating before the District Collector over a broken village road prompted the Allahabad High Court to register a PIL on 14 August 2026.
The Lucknow Bench directed specific posts in the Oudh Bar Association to be reserved for women candidates in 2026 and on a rolling rotation, implementing Supreme Court orders from SLP(C) No. 1404 of 2025.
A Division Bench rules that the State of UP, having withdrawn its challenge to an earlier adverse judgment, cannot revive the same grounds to deny appointment to selected librarians.
A Division Bench dismissed twelve writ petitions challenging the Oil Marketing Companies' February 2025 policy on forced customer transfers from existing LPG distributors to newly commissioned ones.
A Division Bench summoned the Assistant Registrar and ordered an explanation after a writ petition's relief clause was drafted in italicised fonts, breaching court rules.
The Allahabad High Court held that a Magistrate may permit further investigation even after accepting a final report, and that an accused has no right to be heard at the investigation stage.
The Allahabad High Court held that the State Government had no statutory authority to stay a District Magistrate's quasi-judicial order on land acquisition lapse, and remitted the matter for fresh decision under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
A Division Bench dismissed three connected writ petitions challenging a January 2024 award by Varanasi's Special Land Acquisition Officer, holding the award squarely complied with earlier court directions and Supreme Court precedent.
The Allahabad High Court's Lucknow Bench dismissed writ petitions by two postal employees challenging monthly salary deductions made by a cooperative bank to recover loans they had guaranteed.
