Latest Delhi Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
The Division Bench held that the prima facie case under UAPA, the central role attributed to the accused, and the trial's imminent conclusion together outweigh 17 years of pre-trial custody.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav granted bail to two PFI physical trainers accused under PMLA, finding ED had not established the foundational scheduled offence required to characterise their remuneration as proceeds of crime.
Justice Prateek Jalan granted bail to Arun Muthu, Kamlesh Kothari, B. Mohanraj, and Sudheer, holding that their peripheral roles and near-certain trial delay outweigh MCOCA's stringent bail embargo.
A Division Bench found the petitioner's OBC certificate defective under Advertisement Clause 5(iv) because it was issued on the basis of his father's Bihar Bhawan certificate, not a Delhi Government certificate.
A writ petition before the Delhi High Court demands that ZEE5 comply with BIS Standard IS 17802 and be operable by screen-reader technology for disabled users.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court's DNA test order, ruling that three children's right to know their biological father outweighs an alleged father's concern for his own reputation.
Delhi High Court holds it has territorial jurisdiction to hear an IPS officer's writ seeking removal and de-indexing of online content about his settled matrimonial dispute from Google, YouTube and Twitter/X.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging Rule 8(2)(a)(v) of the 2007 Delhi Professional Colleges Rules, holding that institutions may independently fill Management Quota Seats from CET-qualified candidates.
Justice Subramonium Prasad finds conflicting Delhi HC rulings on whether time spent in mediation counts against the 120-day cap for filing a written statement, and refers the question to the Chief Justice for constitution of a two or three-judge bench.
The Division Bench held that roots built through deliberate non-compliance with a foreign court's order cannot defeat that order, directing repatriation of the minor child within six weeks.
Justice Sachin Datta sentenced a UK-based contemnor for wilfully disobeying maintenance orders, directing the CBI to seek an INTERPOL Red Corner Notice and issuing arrest warrants.
Hearing suo motu petitions on Delhi's government hospitals, the Division Bench asked for a live demo of the NextGen e-Hospital system after GNCTD reported rollout across 38 hospitals.
Two CRPF Inspectors denied promotion to Assistant Commandant after a forearm tattoo made them medically unfit failed to persuade the Delhi High Court to order re-examination.
Justice Subramonium Prasad confines the MP's suit to defamation after personality rights arguments were withdrawn, and restrains six explicit AI-generated videos out of fifty-two examined.
Division Bench dismisses TV Today's appeal against a Single Judge order awarding Rs 5 lakh for broadcasting details identifying a child sexual abuse complainant.
Justice Vinod Kumar set aside a Sessions Court bail order, holding that a three-year-old victim's identification of the accused and the place of offence could not be dismissed at the investigation stage.
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court issued a structured timetable for amending AITA's Constitution and holding fresh elections, without disturbing the court-appointed Administrator.
The Delhi High Court held that NTPC Renewable invoked the wrong contractual clauses to terminate awards and issued a suspension order without any show cause notice or hearing.
Justice Tejas Karia held the GNCTD's show-cause notice proposing a CAG audit of BSES distribution companies was premature to challenge and materially distinguishable from the 2015 URJA Judgment.
Justice Tejas Karia directed the Union to issue IT Act notifications within 24 hours to remove content falsely depicting judges and ministers at a London badminton championship.
Justice Neena Bansal Krishna held that a plaintiff's unregistered purchase documents established better possessory title over a J.J. Colony property when the defendant produced no competing documentary evidence at all.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking curtailment of the statutory 30-day waiting period under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, holding that personal hardship cannot override a mandatory legislative mandate.
A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed DTC's appeal, holding that failure to check a conductor's cash and multiple enquiry lapses meant misconduct was never proved.
