Tribunal and commission updates from India's specialist legal forums.
The Rajasthan SCDRC Circuit Bench at Bikaner set aside a district forum award of over Rs. 1.12 lakh against North Western Railway, finding no proved negligence and no valid evidence affidavit from the complainant.
The State Consumer Commission at Chandigarh dismissed M/s Impact Sare Magnum Townships' appeal, holding that no valid possession was ever offered and the complaint was not time-barred.
TDSAT has allowed Mumbai International Airport's appeal against AERA's aeronautical tariff order for Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport, directing AERA to revise its determinations across nineteen regulatory issues within three months.
TDSAT quashes a Mumbai Adjudicating Officer's order directing YES Bank to refund Rs 1.21 crore and pay Rs 29.83 lakh compensation, holding the final hearing was conducted without valid notice.
TDSAT allows Gujarat Petrosynthese's cyber appeal, holding that a body corporate can invoke Section 43 of the IT Act and directing fresh adjudication within six months.
The Competition Commission of India has formed a prima facie opinion of contravention of the Competition Act, 2002 and directed the Director General to investigate Case No. 41 of 2025.
The Competition Commission of India closed a Section 4 complaint against AI video platform InVideo AI, holding that a subscriber's grievance over cancelled paid minutes is a private dispute, not a competition matter.
Three Kolkata-based industrial consumers failed to explain a delay of over 1,125 days in challenging a 2022 DVC tariff order; APTEL dismissed the appeal as time-barred.
Hundreds of overage candidates sought relaxation in the 28-year upper age limit for J&K Police Sub-Inspector posts; CAT Jammu found no arbitrariness and dismissed all seven connected applications.
NCLAT remands to NCLT Mumbai a disputed Master Lease Agreement between Orix Leasing and JSK Marketing, directing fresh consideration of fraud and moratorium violation claims.
NCLAT sets aside NCLT's rejection of a director's Section 7 petition over Rs. 6.86 crore interest-free loan, citing procedural failure and unexamined factual questions about the debt's true character.
NCLAT's Principal Bench dismisses Shefali Agrawal's appeal, holding her claims of illegal removal as director and share dilution were time-barred, with knowledge established from 2013.
NCLAT upholds CIRP admission against two Rana Kapoor-linked real estate companies, ruling the loan recall notice of 9 March 2020 validly triggered default under the IBC.
The Competition Commission found the Director General's comparisons of hospital prices with standalone diagnostic labs and procurement costs inadequate to establish unfair pricing under Section 4.
The Competition Commission found the Director General's methodology flawed on relevant market, pricing comparisons, and dominant position, closing the decade-long Section 4 inquiry.
The Competition Commission finds a prima facie case of exclusive dealing under Section 3(4)(b) against Pernod Ricard and linked wholesalers and retailers in Delhi's IMFL market.
The Competition Commission of India dismissed a complaint alleging predatory pricing and market abuse by ride-hailing platform Rapido, finding the charges unsubstantiated under competition law.
The Competition Commission of India declined interim directions against Venkateshwara Hatcheries and related entities, holding the informant failed to meet the high threshold set by the Supreme Court in the SAIL judgment.
NCLAT finds Rs 3.6 crore transferred to Ligare Aviation and immediately routed back to a Religare subsidiary the same day was not a genuine financial debt under IBC.
NCLAT's Principal Bench reverses NCLT Chandigarh's dismissal of nine IBC Section 7 applications filed by J&K Integrated Textiles Park, finding financial debt proved and Section 65 penalty unsustainable.
Uttarakhand Power Corporation's attempt to levy cross subsidy surcharge on mid-term open access consumers fails as APTEL upholds the UERC's interpretation of Regulation 22.
APTEL dismissed GRIDCO Limited's review petition challenging its September 2025 judgment on a revised PPA dispute with Vedanta, finding no error apparent on the face of record.
APTEL rejected BSES Rajdhani and BSES Yamuna's attempt to substitute its reasoned CAG audit ruling and separately pressed DERC to begin regulatory asset liquidation by 16 June 2026.
APTEL refused to stay a 2021 KERC order restoring PPA tariff of Rs.5.07/kWh to a solar developer, finding BESCOM had slept on its rights for over four years.
