Latest Rajasthan Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
Justice Inderjeet Singh and Justice Sandeep Taneja held that the May 2022 amendment to Rule 19 of the Collegiate Branch Rules cannot govern a recruitment advertised in November 2021, that Ajay Hasia does not control public employment, and that Dr Rachita Mathur concealed an earlier Jodhpur petition on the same point.
Justice Nupur Bhati sat on a holiday to hear a Balotra couple whose names were deleted from a gram panchayat electoral roll, and held that once the election programme of 3 October was out, a direction to restore them would disturb the process in a way Article 243-O is meant to prevent.
Hearing the batch on a Sunday with the fee deadline a day away, Justice Nupur Bhati held that Clause 8.4 of the 2022 policy gives colleges time to get accredited but does not excuse the separate conditions for extending a temporary NOC, which every one of the seven had been found to breach.
Justice Sudesh Bansal decided three arbitration appeals from 2007 and 2015 together, severing two claims and the 18 per cent interest while sustaining the rest of the award.
Justice Mukesh Rajpurohit holds that an accused may compel the statutory step under Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA, and that directing it is not a transfer of a criminal case.
Chief Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Justice Sameer Jain hold that the Najeeb melt-down principle does not reach a case where the trial is running day to day and the witness list has been halved.
The Rajasthan High Court upholds the cancellation of seven leases over industrial land at Kota, holding that the fraud lay not in any single false statement but in the promise of revival and everything the buyer did afterwards.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand found that the Class-I admission form, not the matriculation certificate, controls age determination under Section 94 of the JJ Act, and issued extensive interim directions on preliminary assessments and aftercare.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand gave the State and district police six weeks to restore possession of a Neemrana flat to IndusInd Bank after borrowers muscled back in despite a Section 14 SARFAESI order.
A Jaipur student who omitted to claim Rajasthan domicile reservation in her CLAT 2026 form could not correct the omission after results were declared, the Rajasthan High Court has ruled.
Rajasthan High Court quashes a Permanent Lok Adalat award directing grant of service benefits, holding that service matters do not fall within the forum's statutory jurisdiction over public utility services.
The Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur has restrained the State from declaring the final result in Assistant Professor (English) recruitment after objections to the model answer key were allegedly overlooked.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand held that once Rajasthan State Election Commission declared the municipal election schedule, courts cannot interfere with voter list deletions under Article 243-ZG.
Justice Ravi Chirania at Jodhpur has issued a standing direction to the GA-cum-AAG office to secure factual reports from police within 3-7 days of a bail application being filed, to end delays in hearing bail matters on merits.
Justice Baljinder Singh Sandhu rejected bail for a 19-year-old accused of carrying 180 grams of Mephedrone, holding that the SHO had complied with Section 42 of the NDPS Act before the nighttime search.
Jodhpur bench dismisses a quashing petition, holding that a reasoned magistrate order directing further investigation does not amount to dictating the mode of investigation to police.
Rajasthan High Court directs officials to issue no-dues certificate to a man seeking to contest panchayat elections, refusing to hold him liable for recovery dues owed by his wife as former Sarpanch.
A Rajasthan High Court Division Bench has stayed Paragraph 4 of a CAT Jaipur order dated 25 August 2026 while issuing notice to Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti.
The Rajasthan High Court directed that lists of encroachers on government land in the Ramgarh dam catchment area be published in Rajasthan Patrika and Dainik Bhaskar, giving encroachers 15 days to vacate.
A PIL exposing contractor corruption in Rajasthan's tap water scheme has prompted the High Court to press both State and Centre on completing Jal Jeevan Mission coverage across the State.
The Rajasthan High Court expressed shock that encroachers on government land in Dausa were allowed to cultivate and received the harvested crop back for a mere Rs. 500.
The Rajasthan High Court's Division Bench set aside a Single Judge order and directed CSIR-CEERI to consider Umesh Singh for compassionate appointment, ruling that survival on meagre pension is not proof that a family's financial crisis has ended.
Justice Anuroop Singhi stayed two charge-sheets against a JDA-posted officer, finding the issuing authority may have lacked jurisdiction and the subject matter remains pending before the court.
