Latest Rajasthan Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
Justice Sanjeet Purohit held that prison accommodations granted on medical grounds survive the conclusion of appellate proceedings and directed restoration of facilities for the 85-year-old POCSO convict.
Rajasthan High Court directs trial court to secure a conclusive investigation report within six weeks, holding that Magistrates must actively supervise probes ordered under Section 156(3) CrPC.
A retired Patwari waited over two years for pension after superannuation; the Jodhpur Bench held that an incomplete service book maintained by the State cannot justify withholding earned benefits.
The Rajasthan High Court held that contractual vocational trainers serving under a government scheme cannot be replaced by another set of contractual employees through a new service provider.
Rajasthan High Court holds that a negative final report exonerating a candidate of a false rape FIR triggers eligibility under the State's 2019 character-verification circular, not disqualification.
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a challenge by Senior Residents who lacked one year of post-MD experience by the 29 January 2025 application deadline for Assistant Professor posts.
A vacation bench at Jodhpur invoked Article 226 jurisdiction after newspaper reports flagged encroachments on Rupsagar Talab, structural failures in Madar Canal, and commercial development near Fatehsagar Lake.
Rajasthan High Court quashes a 2008 compensation award, holding that oral testimony alone cannot establish employer-employee relationship under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
The Rajasthan High Court held that once a complainant denies both handwriting and signatures on a document, he cannot later claim the document has no nexus with the transaction.
Justice Farjand Ali held that a party cannot lose a statutory right of appeal because its advocate failed to remove a procedural defect within the stipulated time.
Justice Farjand Ali dismissed a quashing petition filed by a serving Forest Guard accused of deploying a dummy candidate in the 2020 Forest Guard Recruitment Examination, finding prima facie material warranting continued investigation.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand held that rejecting a Section 91 CrPC application on technical grounds, when the accused had no prior knowledge of the document, amounted to denial of fair trial.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand disposed of cross petitions in a Dausa murder FIR, directing the SP to monitor investigation and stop harassment of accused at the police station.
A vacation bench at Jodhpur invoked suo motu jurisdiction after newspaper reports revealed that only a fraction of Rajasthan's 46,748 wetland units have been notified under the 2017 Rules.
The Rajasthan High Court held that a candidate who represented Haryana in an All India Inter-University Cricket Championship cannot be denied the Outstanding Sports Person reservation if she is a bonafide Rajasthan resident.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand held that summons on Armed Forces personnel must be routed through their Commanding Officer, not sent by registered post, quashing an ex-parte Sessions Court order.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand quashed a negative final report in a 2015 murder FIR, holding that an investigator must arrange a language interpreter rather than abandon a narcoanalysis test.
Rajasthan High Court dismisses State's writ against a Tribunal order directing promotion of a school education employee whose service record was clean as on the relevant vacancy date.
A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court upheld a Commercial Court's decision to award interest only from the date of legal notice, rejecting the supplier's claim for interest from 2008 due to prolonged inaction.
The Rajasthan High Court has directed the State to reassess vacancies and offer appointments to meritorious candidates who lost out solely because of a defective answer key in the 2022 Teacher Grade III recruitment.
The Rajasthan High Court held that a criminal court cannot take cognizance of water pollution offences unless the complainant holds valid prior authorization under Section 49 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
Doctors who voluntarily declined Non-Practising Allowance to retain private practice cannot claim pay parity with juniors who surrendered that practice, the Rajasthan High Court has ruled in a batch of 35 writ petitions.
