Latest Rajasthan Hc updates from LegalRepublic.in.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand directed the UIT, Sriganganagar to constitute a committee within fifteen days to hear objections and examine title claims before any demolition proceeds under the 1981–2001 Master Plan.
Justice Anand Sharma disposed of 105 writ petitions challenging arbitrary account freezes, directing that restraints be confined to disputed amounts and that the DGP issue a standing order within four weeks.
A Division Bench at Jodhpur found the Single Judge's order appointing a retired Chief Justice of India to adjudicate claims inconsistent with the statutory scheme under the Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002.
The Rajasthan High Court held that awarding Rs 1 lakh to a Post-Graduate Teacher whose illegal termination spanned over 67 months was shockingly disproportionate, substituting Rs 20 lakh.
Allottees who paid full consideration in 2011 still lack possession; Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand directs a three-month resolution with alternative plots or DLC-rate compensation as fallback.
A 17-year-old's right to study abroad cannot be blocked because his divorced, absent father will not sign the passport application, the Rajasthan High Court held.
A disabled MBBS student already in his third year was declared ineligible without reasons or assessment of assistive devices; the Rajasthan High Court found that legally indefensible.
The Rajasthan High Court directed CPWD to accept an offline appeal after a contractor's technical bid rejection, citing ambiguous portal instructions and the maxim ubi jus ibi remedium.
A Division Bench upheld directions to honour a highest e-auction bid for a Mansarovar commercial plot, finding the Minister's unilateral cancellation arbitrary and the Board's post-facto approval a paper formality.
Rajasthan High Court disposes of a PIL by 60 Bheel villagers of Village Gawar, Kumbhalgarh, holding that families living on khatedari land since settlement may repair and extend existing houses despite proximity to Kumbhalgarh Fort.
The Rajasthan High Court held that the University of Rajasthan could not deny reimbursement for a retired employee's COVID-19 treatment at non-recognised Delhi hospitals, including AIIMS and Sri Gangaram Hospital.
Justice Ashok Kumar Jain allowed a third bail plea in a 2023 murder case and directed a vigilance inquiry into the trial court after the prosecution's star witness denied being an eyewitness following an unexplained 19-month gap between examination-in-chief and cross-examination.
The Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur has stayed Railways construction of a boundary wall near a commercial plot holding a registered JDA lease deed, pending reply from the respondents.
A Division Bench at Jodhpur has registered a suo motu PIL after IIT Bombay found the High Court building's Central Dome structurally compromised and at imminent risk of collapse, directing top officials to appear personally.
The Rajasthan High Court directed the State to appoint two Tribunal Members within one week after the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal remained non-functional for want of a Chairman and Members.
A Division Bench at Jaipur has ordered the Commissioner, Nagar Nigam to halt unauthorised construction on key roads of the 300-year-old Pink City and restore its heritage character.
Rajasthan High Court quashes FIR lodged three years after a registered inter-religious marriage, holding rape charge unsustainable against a legally wedded husband under Exception 2 to Section 375 IPC.
Justice Ashok Kumar Jain granted bail to an accused in a POCSO and BNS case while directing the DGP, Rajasthan to arrange training for investigating officers on statutory age-determination procedures.
Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur held that procedural lapses in communicating arrest grounds do not automatically entitle accused to bail absent demonstrable prejudice, and denied bail to four examination centre personnel.
Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani held that the Returning Officer and Election Commission of India are necessary parties given contradictory figures for rejected postal ballots issued on the same date.
A Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court found that two suspension extension orders against an IRS officer were arbitrary, malicious in law, and designed to block his promotion during a departmental promotion committee.
Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand quashed a Special Court's rejection of a supurdagi application, holding that a vehicle owner not charge-sheeted in an NDPS case is entitled to interim custody of the seized vehicle.
A Jodhpur resident's PIL sought a sweeping survey, slaughter restrictions, and licence cancellations; the Division Bench found the municipal regulatory framework already adequate.
A Division Bench at Jaipur directed JDA's counsel to file a response explaining why cement concrete drain channels near Ambawadi, recommended by NEERI, have not been constructed.
